[Etoys] Looking for a development version of OLPC-Etoys080211
korakurider at gmail.com
Mon Mar 24 23:46:07 EDT 2008
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Simon Guest
<simon.guest at tesujimath.org> wrote:
> I've been using the "experimental version of OLPC image for non-XO
> environments", posted by Yoshiki on 7 Feb 2008, and targeted at being
> the next Squeakland release I think.
> As well as doing the EToys thing, I'm trying to do Smalltalk
> development with it*. So I need a development version. Is there such
> a thing somewhere?
Current development effort toward "OLPC Etoys" and next version of
Squeakland (called Squeakland OLPC) for non-XO is basically unified
and development image for them is same.
(This was update to
> The image as is has no support for Monticello, and attempts to load it
> from SqueakMap give me errors. Any suggestions here?
> Is there a better list to use to discuss Smalltalk development on this
hope this helps.
> * And here's the explanation for that. I am in the process of
> introducing Squeak EToys into my school, based on the OLPC EToys
> image, which seems the best choice now for that sort of thing. But
> there are also several things I also want to do not supported by
> this image, like my LatexMorph, which relies on OSProcess. And so on.
> Etoys mailing list
> Etoys at lists.laptop.org
More information about the Etoys