[Testing] New Sugar [0.84 not 0.88 in fact!] on XO-1, by Steven Parrish

[Holt]

Sorry for all the confusion yesterday :)


Subject: 	Re: [support-gang] New Sugar 0.84 on XO-1, by Steven Parrish
Date: 	Mon, 5 Jul 2010 09:38:36 -0400
From: 	Steven Parrish <smparrish at gmail.com>
To: 	Community Support Volunteers -- who help respond to "help AT 
laptop.org" <support-gang at lists.laptop.org>


On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Gary Martin <garycmartin at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
> On 5 Jul 2010, at 01:02, Mike Lee <curiouslee at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The instructions page says this is Sugar 0.88. I assume this is correct?
>
> No, looking at the two XO-1's I installed Sugar is listed as 0.84.16,
> firmware Q2E44.
> Regards,
> --Gary
>
> Mike
> On Jul 4, 2010, at 7:39 PM, Holt <holt at laptop.org> wrote:
>
> "Announcing a new Fedora for the XO-1 release
>
> Today I am releasing OS16 for the XO-1. You can get it here [1].
> Installations instructions are here [2].
>
> This build brings us more inline with the work being done for the XO-1.5, as
> well it includes several changes incorporated from the Paraguay builds.
>
> I want to thank Bernie Innocenti for his work done on the Paraguay build and
> his efforts to stabilize the system as we work towards an official release.
> Thanks to the XO-1.5 team as well for all their work.
>
> SMP" [3] [4]
>
>
> [1] http://people.sugarlabs.org/~smparrish/
> [2] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Deployment_Team/Fedora_on_the_XO-1
> [3] http://smparrish.livejournal.com/13402.html
> [4] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.84/Notes (Sugar 0.84 Release Notes, from
> 2009)
...

Yes it is still 0.84.  Bernie is testing 0.88 builds in Paraguay and I
hope to move to 0.88 soon.

The wiki includes info on 0.88 to help me track the issues.

Steven
_______________________________________________
support-gang mailing list
support-gang at lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/support-gang

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/testing/attachments/20100705/4befb338/attachment.htm