[Testing] [support-gang] SL meet SL! (Sri Lanka, Sugar Labs, Service Learning, Schools & Libraries, Soft Landing, Shangri-La, Silent Lucidity, etc)
James Cameron
quozl at laptop.org
Mon Apr 5 19:47:14 EDT 2010
- Previous message: [Testing] SL meet SL! (Sri Lanka, Sugar Labs, Service Learning, Schools & Libraries, Soft Landing, Shangri-La, Silent Lucidity, etc)
- Next message: [Testing] [support-gang] SL meet SL! (Sri Lanka, Sugar Labs, Service Learning, Schools & Libraries, Soft Landing, Shangri-La, Silent Lucidity, etc)
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 01:20:19PM -0500, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
> The very first row in the test case format led me off on tangents.
> While it is obvious that -- if an Activity is launched by clicking on
> its icon -- its icon must be there :
>
> What if the icon were not there ?
Good point.
Another scenario: what if the icon is coloured because there is a
journal entry that will be launched?
> I'm wondering how many of the above potential reasons for not seeing the
> Activity's icon might justify an 'Activity's test failed' conclusion ?
Any of them, in my opinion.
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
- Previous message: [Testing] SL meet SL! (Sri Lanka, Sugar Labs, Service Learning, Schools & Libraries, Soft Landing, Shangri-La, Silent Lucidity, etc)
- Next message: [Testing] [support-gang] SL meet SL! (Sri Lanka, Sugar Labs, Service Learning, Schools & Libraries, Soft Landing, Shangri-La, Silent Lucidity, etc)
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Testing
mailing list