[Testing] [support-gang]  SL meet SL! (Sri Lanka, Sugar Labs, Service Learning, Schools & Libraries, Soft Landing, Shangri-La, Silent Lucidity, etc)
    James Cameron 
    quozl at laptop.org
       
    Mon Apr  5 19:47:14 EDT 2010
    
        - Previous message: [Testing] SL meet SL! (Sri Lanka, Sugar Labs, Service Learning, Schools & Libraries, Soft Landing, Shangri-La, Silent Lucidity, etc)
 
        - Next message: [Testing] [support-gang]  SL meet SL! (Sri Lanka, Sugar Labs,	Service Learning, Schools & Libraries, Soft Landing,	Shangri-La, Silent 	Lucidity, etc)
 
         -  Messages sorted by: 
              [ date ]
              [ thread ]
              [ subject ]
              [ author ]
         
 
       
    
  
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 01:20:19PM -0500, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
> The very first row in the test case format led me off on tangents.
> While it is obvious that -- if an Activity is launched by clicking on
> its icon -- its icon must be there :
> 
> What if the icon were not there ?
Good point.
Another scenario: what if the icon is coloured because there is a
journal entry that will be launched?
> I'm wondering how many of the above potential reasons for not seeing the
> Activity's icon might justify an  'Activity's test failed'  conclusion ?
Any of them, in my opinion.
-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
    
    
        
	- Previous message: [Testing] SL meet SL! (Sri Lanka, Sugar Labs, Service Learning, Schools & Libraries, Soft Landing, Shangri-La, Silent Lucidity, etc)
 
	- Next message: [Testing] [support-gang]  SL meet SL! (Sri Lanka, Sugar Labs,	Service Learning, Schools & Libraries, Soft Landing,	Shangri-La, Silent 	Lucidity, etc)
 
         -  Messages sorted by: 
              [ date ]
              [ thread ]
              [ subject ]
              [ author ]
         
 
       
More information about the Testing
mailing list