[Testing] Test meeting minutes, 7/9/07

[Kim Quirk]

Hi Marco,
We had set up a schedule that we would take builds every day last week and
then just two builds this week and hopefully just one build next week (code
freeze). We had this discussion with J5, but we didn't send it out to the
entire dev team. That was about 3 or 4 weeks ago.

We need the bug fixes that we are expecting to continue to get checked in so
they will be in the next build. So this week we have the 494 build; and we
hope/expect to get a build on Thurs night or Friday. That will be RC3.

We actually took a quick look at 495 and it was so broken it didn't start up
sugar. So we are using 494 for the next two days.

John,
Is this still your intention? Can we plan to get a release on Friday morning
for the test groups?

Thanks,
Kim

On 7/10/07, Marco Pesenti Gritti <mpg at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Kim Quirk wrote:
> >
> >     * The test groups don't want new builds every day. We should use
> >       the current build 494 for a few days to really get to some
> >       detailed testing. We should have the next good build on Thursday
> >       or Friday.
> >
>
> Hello,
>
> this make sense to me but we need to coordinate it. I'd rather not spend
> time on builds if they are not useful to the testing group. I think we
> should either do builds on one or two fixed days per week or, if we need
> more flexibility, have the testing team suggest days for the builds time
> by time.
>
> About this week, we should have a new good build today since everything
> is already in place (feel free to ignore if you prefer to stick with
> 494). I'll target the next one on Friday then.
>
> Marco
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.laptop.org/private/testing/attachments/20070710/686c4a83/attachment.htm