[Testing] Test meeting minutes, 7/9/07

[Zack Cerza]

Kim,

I can't get the mesh working at all on 494. Dan told me that we 
shouldn't be using 494, and that 495 is better. But if sugar doesn't 
start up, that's not the case. What should we be doing?

Zack

Kim Quirk wrote:
> Hi Marco,
> We had set up a schedule that we would take builds every day last week 
> and then just two builds this week and hopefully just one build next 
> week (code freeze). We had this discussion with J5, but we didn't send 
> it out to the entire dev team. That was about 3 or 4 weeks ago.
> 
> We need the bug fixes that we are expecting to continue to get checked 
> in so they will be in the next build. So this week we have the 494 
> build; and we hope/expect to get a build on Thurs night or Friday. That 
> will be RC3.
> 
> We actually took a quick look at 495 and it was so broken it didn't 
> start up sugar. So we are using 494 for the next two days.
> 
> John,
> Is this still your intention? Can we plan to get a release on Friday 
> morning for the test groups?
> 
> Thanks,
> Kim
> 
> On 7/10/07, *Marco Pesenti Gritti* <mpg at redhat.com 
> <mailto:mpg at redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Kim Quirk wrote:
>      >
>      >     * The test groups don't want new builds every day. We should use
>      >       the current build 494 for a few days to really get to some
>      >       detailed testing. We should have the next good build on
>     Thursday
>      >       or Friday.
>      >
> 
>     Hello,
> 
>     this make sense to me but we need to coordinate it. I'd rather not spend
>     time on builds if they are not useful to the testing group. I think we
>     should either do builds on one or two fixed days per week or, if we
>     need
>     more flexibility, have the testing team suggest days for the builds time
>     by time.
> 
>     About this week, we should have a new good build today since everything
>     is already in place (feel free to ignore if you prefer to stick with
>     494). I'll target the next one on Friday then.
> 
>     Marco
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Testing mailing list
> Testing at lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/testing