[sugar] notes on 8.2.0, specifically 767 (was 8.2.1)

[Bernie Innocenti]

pgf at laptop.org wrote:
>  >  > * Firefox 2 and 3 are only slightly sugarized.
>  > GS - True. It is what it is and no plans to make big changes here AFAIK.
> 
> greg -- i think you answered your own question.  the issues
> raised in that linked email are a result of firefox not being
> fully sugarized.  it might be possible to improve their behavior,
> but this falls squarely under the big "make traditional X11 apps
> work better under sugar" umbrella.

We already have a Sugarized version of Firefox: Browse.  But people
complained the interface didn't look and behave like Firefox.
So now we provide a Firefox activity, but people complain it's not
sugarized enough!!!

We can't win this game ;-)

-- 
   // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
 \X/  Sugar Labs       - http://www.sugarlabs.org/