[sugar] notes on 8.2.0, specifically 767 (was 8.2.1)

Tomeu Vizoso tomeu at sugarlabs.org
Sat Nov 29 16:53:51 EST 2008


On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Bernie Innocenti <bernie at laptop.org> wrote:
> pgf at laptop.org wrote:
>>  >  > * Firefox 2 and 3 are only slightly sugarized.
>>  > GS - True. It is what it is and no plans to make big changes here AFAIK.
>>
>> greg -- i think you answered your own question.  the issues
>> raised in that linked email are a result of firefox not being
>> fully sugarized.  it might be possible to improve their behavior,
>> but this falls squarely under the big "make traditional X11 apps
>> work better under sugar" umbrella.
>
> We already have a Sugarized version of Firefox: Browse.  But people
> complained the interface didn't look and behave like Firefox.
> So now we provide a Firefox activity, but people complain it's not
> sugarized enough!!!
>
> We can't win this game ;-)

But you can bet it's fun to watch ;)

Tomeu


More information about the Sugar mailing list