[OLPC Security] Periodic identity updates

[Karl O. Pinc]

On 02/22/2007 10:22:22 PM, John Kemp wrote:

> Perhaps, to avoid future discussion of such out of scope threats,
> there
> should be a section of the specification which details the
> "non-goals",
> or threats which are explicitly out-of-scope?

It's hard to enumerate a universe of negatives, but it
is possible to either finalize the threat model or
simply announce the fulitity of a discussion
that is clearly not going to affect implimentation.
Most people will shut up when it's clear there's
no point in talking.


Karl <kop at meme.com>
Free Software:  "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
                  -- Robert A. Heinlein