[OLPC Security] Periodic identity updates

[frumioj at mac.com]

I wasn't suggesting that any unknown universe of negatives be
enumerated; rather that /known/ "non-goals" of the specification are
noted somewhere explicitly, where they can be pointed to in otherwise
futile discussions.

Regards,

- John

Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> 
> On 02/22/2007 10:22:22 PM, John Kemp wrote:
> 
>> Perhaps, to avoid future discussion of such out of scope threats,
>> there
>> should be a section of the specification which details the
>> "non-goals",
>> or threats which are explicitly out-of-scope?
> 
> It's hard to enumerate a universe of negatives, but it
> is possible to either finalize the threat model or
> simply announce the fulitity of a discussion
> that is clearly not going to affect implimentation.
> Most people will shut up when it's clear there's
> no point in talking.
> 
> 
> Karl <kop at meme.com>
> Free Software:  "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
>                  -- Robert A. Heinlein
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Security mailing list
> Security at laptop.org
> http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/security