[Http-crcsync] First contact with a crcsync server

Patrick McManus mcmanus at ducksong.com
Wed Jul 8 19:01:13 EDT 2009


On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 15:03 -0700, Pedro R wrote:
> 
> It could, but it can make things more complicated. There might be some web server implementations which do not respond correctly or ignore the OPTIONS method?
> 

it obviously needs to be implemented on the server side but so does the
rest of the protocol extension. I don't see anything special about the
requirement jumping out at me - and this is exactly the kind of thing
OPTIONS was envisioned for..







More information about the Http-crcsync mailing list