[Http-crcsync] First contact with a crcsync server

Pedro R eusou15 at yahoo.com
Wed Jul 8 18:03:18 EDT 2009



It could, but it can make things more complicated. There might be some web server implementations which do not respond correctly or ignore the OPTIONS method?

Pedro


--- On Thu, 9/7/09, Patrick McManus <mcmanus at ducksong.com> wrote:

> From: Patrick McManus <mcmanus at ducksong.com>
> Subject: Re: [Http-crcsync] First contact with a crcsync server
> To: "Pedro R" <eusou15 at yahoo.com>
> Cc: http-crcsync at lists.laptop.org
> Date: Thursday, 9 July, 2009, 1:24 AM
> On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 13:30 -0700,
> Pedro R wrote:
> > o there must be a way for a client to identify a 
> > crcsync server (once it is identified it is added to a
> whitelist and 
> > subsequent requests will always have the crcsync
> headers).
> > 
> 
> 
> this kind of feature probing is what the OPTIONS method is
> explicitly
> meant to do. Perhaps that can be made to work?
> 
> 


      


More information about the Http-crcsync mailing list