[OLPC-Games] Anyone interested in a Game Jam?

[Bert Freudenberg]

No, I rather guess he was surprised by the fact that apparently no  
team even considered using Etoys for their game.

But equally surprising is that most, if not all talk on this list  
seems to be revolving around programming games for kids, rather than  
with them.

- Bert -

On Nov 21, 2007, at 22:20 , Jason Pratt wrote:

> I'm not sure what I'm supposed to take away from this...
>
> - that eToys is vastly superior to whatever was being used at Game  
> Jam Brasil?
> - that the Game Jam Brasil participants weren't very competent?
> - that this particular developer is significantly more skilled than
> the Game Jam Brasil participants?
>
> It's not clear what he's advocating.
>
>
> On 11/16/07, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>> Want to share this comment of a fellow Brasilian developer:
>>
>> "At Game Jam Brasil last weekend, none of the teams used eToys. I was
>> able to reproduce their games (which they took 29 hours to program)
>> in just a few minutes in eToys. And using the machine itself rather
>> than a separate development PC.
>>
>> Though to be fair, I was programming games in Basic before any of the
>> participants were born"
>>
>> - Bert -
>>
>> On Nov 16, 2007, at 18:28 , Samuel Klein wrote:
>>
>>> I should have read all my mail before asking :-)  Also, here's a set
>>> of photos just uploaded to the wiki from the Brasil jam last  
>>> weekend:
>>>
>>> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Game_Jam_Brasil
>>>
>>> SJ!
>>>
>>> On Nov 4, 2007 10:35 PM, Andrew Clunis <andrew at orospakr.ca> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 14:33 -0400, Mike C. Fletcher wrote:
>>>>> Myles Braithwaite wrote:
>>>>>> I am definitely in.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Alright, as of now it's just Myles and I, with Soni maybe showing
>>>>> up if
>>>>> she's got time that weekend.  Anyone else interested?  We're still
>>>>> thinking of the weekend of the 16th of November.  (Same time as
>>>>> the CMU
>>>>> Game Jam IIUC).  With such a small number of people we might be
>>>>> able to
>>>>> hold it at Linux Caffe.  I'm going to be in Taiwan come
>>>>> Wednesday, so if
>>>>> we're going to have more people I'll need to know about it soon
>>>>> so I can
>>>>> find a bigger venue (and/or book a table or two at Linux Caffe).
>>>>
>>>> I might be interested in coming too!  I'm the guy who was  
>>>> working on
>>>> Develop activity earlier this year, but being in Ottawa has left  
>>>> me a
>>>> bit cut off from all the other OLPC people.
>>>>
>>>> I *might* need a place to spend the night, though!
>>>>
>>>>> No way we'd finish all of that in a weekend, though... still, it
>>>>> would
>>>>> be interesting to see how far we got.  I'm sure a smaller game
>>>>> would be
>>>>> far more practical.  Or we could just cut it down a lot and  
>>>>> consider
>>>>> basic playability the goal, with the various extra rules as
>>>>> secondary.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, I suggest the iterative approach is probably best.  If your
>>>> game
>>>> is always at least running to some degree, more people will be
>>>> encouraged to jump in and contribute. :)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Andrew Clunis
>>>>
>>