hilaire at ofset.org
Wed Jul 4 11:16:32 EDT 2007
That would be really great !!
2007/7/4, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>:
> Yes, that's what I meant. So for a string in a method of a class in
> category "Foo-Bar" we would look at "Foo.mo". Or, for even more
> sophistication, look for "Foo-Bar.mo" first, and if that does not
> exist look in "Foo.mo".
> - Bert -
> On Jul 4, 2007, at 12:19 , Hilaire Fernandes wrote:
> > Don't you think a .po file per class category is a too small unit?
> > Or do you mean the 'MyPackage' of MyPackage-catagory?
> > Hilaire
> > 2007/7/4, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>:
> >> On Jul 4, 2007, at 9:30 , Hilaire Fernandes wrote:
> >>> 2007/7/1, Takashi Yamamiya <tak at metatoys.org>:
> >>>> That's a good idea. What's your definition of Squeak Application? I
> >>>> think a .pr whould be a good unit.
> >>> Hum, I was thinking about a Monticello source package as a good unit
> >>> place to integrate language catalogs. This is at least the unit I am
> >>> using to distribute DrGeoII source code.
> >> Right - see my previous message. We want to have a separate .po file
> >> for each class category, which is roughly equivalent to a Monticello
> >> package.
> >> - Bert -
> Etoys mailing list
> Etoys at lists.laptop.org
More information about the Etoys