[Etoys] Translations

[Bert Freudenberg]

Yes, that's what I meant. So for a string in a method of a class in  
category "Foo-Bar" we would look at "Foo.mo".  Or, for even more  
sophistication, look for "Foo-Bar.mo" first, and if that does not  
exist look in "Foo.mo".

- Bert -

On Jul 4, 2007, at 12:19 , Hilaire Fernandes wrote:

> Don't you think a .po file per class category is a too small unit?
> Or do you mean the 'MyPackage' of MyPackage-catagory?
>
> Hilaire
>
> 2007/7/4, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>:
>>
>> On Jul 4, 2007, at 9:30 , Hilaire Fernandes wrote:
>>
>>> 2007/7/1, Takashi Yamamiya <tak at metatoys.org>:
>>>
>>>> That's a good idea. What's your definition of Squeak Application? I
>>>> think a .pr whould be a good unit.
>>>
>>> Hum, I was thinking about a Monticello source package as a good unit
>>> place to integrate language catalogs. This is at least the unit I am
>>> using to distribute DrGeoII source code.
>>
>> Right - see my previous message. We want to have a separate .po file
>> for each class category, which is roughly equivalent to a Monticello
>> package.
>>
>> - Bert -