[Sugar-devel] XO on Fedora 20 (was Re: [GSoC] Porting To Python3)
dwnarvaez at gmail.com
Mon May 12 18:46:15 EDT 2014
On 13 May 2014 00:43, Paul Fox <pgf at laptop.org> wrote:
> daniel wrote:
> > * Should we contribute the olpc-os-builder changes back to OLPC or fork
> > > I don't know if OLPC will do any active development on the linux side
> > > things, if not maybe better to turn this into a sugarlabs thing.
> > Yes. I don't really have a strong feeling one way or another. I can send
> > patches for the generic parts if they are wanted.
> > I think we also need a place where to put reference configurations. I
> > initially had put them in olpc-os-builder, numbered as 14.0.0 but that
> > feels wrong... since no official olpc releases are planned. I suppose I
> > could edit the examples/f18-[model].ini ones instead, but I would need
> > access to whatever repository we use to change those without needing
> > every time.
> in my opinion, the value of not forking would outweigh the risk of
> giving commit privs to someone from (gasp!) sugarlabs. ;-) (that really
> is just an opinion, of course. it's not my call.)
I don't know... we are kind of dangerous people :P
> it also seems like this problem could be well solved with branches and
> tags. i haven't looked at the o-o-b tree, but i assume the current
> 13.2.0 point could be frozen (branch or tag) and other work could
> continue, and eventually branched or tagged itself.
Yeah, I made my changes on a branch already (v8.0).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Devel