[Sugar-devel] XO on Fedora 20 (was Re: [GSoC] Porting To Python3)
godiard at sugarlabs.org
Tue May 13 10:13:25 EDT 2014
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12 May 2014 21:07, Gonzalo Odiard <godiard at sugarlabs.org> wrote:
>> First, thanks for doing this work.
> Thanks for helping out.
>> I would like to take a step back and understand a bit better where we
>>> want to go with this. Some random thoughts and questions.
>>> * To really understand how much work is left I think we need some good
>>> testing, especially on the hardware related bits. I expect there will be
>>> lots of small things to fix, but it would be good to understand as early as
>>> possible if there are roadblocks. I'm a bad tester and I've never used the
>>> XO much, so I'm often not sure what is a regression and what is not... thus
>>> helping with this would be particularly appreciated.
>> This is a issue. If we have a Sugar with similar functionalities
>> (settings and activities installed) we can request help from deployments
>> and volunteers.
> Are you thinking to deployment specific settings and activities here? Or
> some kind of subset/reference that is good enough for all the interested
I think we should do a "generic" version. We can start with the activities
used by example in AU,
but add more based on deployment requests. In the xo-1 models space is a
but not so much in the others, and the benefit is have more testing.
> * Are interested deployments using olpc-update? If I'm not mistake AU is
>> We are not using it. I am pretty sure Nicaragua use it.
> Is AU using yum?
Yes, we use a deamon calling yum with a particular configuration.
Recently I am testing dnf in F20, and I am impressed. If there are not
could be nice use it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Devel