F11-for-XO1.5 Release 10.1.1 Release Candidate 2

[Peter Robinson]

On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Derek O'Connell <doc at doconnel.f9.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I don't have much experience creating patches so please let me know if the
> attached is the wrong format for your purposes. Created using:
>
> diff -cB
> /home/doc/std/dev/squeak/vm/3.10-5/unix-3.10-5/platforms/unix/vm-sound-ALSA/sqUnixSoundALSA.c
> /home/doc/std/dev/squeak/vm/3.11.3/src/squeak-svn/platforms/unix/vm-sound-ALSA/sqUnixSoundALSA.c
>>sqUnixSoundALSA.patch

If you could use 'diff -u origfile newfile > output.patch' from the
root of the source tree that would be better.

Thanks,
Peter

> On 14/06/10 11:58, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Bert Freudenberg<bert at freudenbergs.de>
>>  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 14.06.2010, at 06:24, Chris Ball wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Bert,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Copied ~olpc/Activities/Sratch.activity/vm-sound-ALSA plugin to
>>>>> /usr/lib/squeak/3.10-5/.
>>>>>
>>>>> After that, in Etoys playback sounds a bit worse, but it's still
>>>>> okay (hard to tell actually). And no freeze after suspend,
>>>>> playing just resumes. So it would be a good idea to use that ALSA
>>>>> plugin for Squeak in general, me thinks.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Could we get a squeak/etoys package with a fixed alsa-plugin ASAP,
>>>> please?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Someone would need to rebuild Fedora's squeak-vm-3.10-5 package with
>>> Derek's patched sqUnixSoundALSA.c file (attached to the forwarded msg
>>> below). The etoys package is unaffected.
>>>
>>
>> I'm happy to apply a patch to the etoys package in Fedora if someone
>> can provide me a patch rather than a complete new source file.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>
>