Fedora Desktop on XO

[Peter Robinson]

>>   > For the evince vs sugar-evince I suspect we need to try and get the
>>   > mainline evince split out into evince and evince-libs so that we
>>   > can build sugar-evince against it similar to what we do with
>>   > abiword and write (I think that's its name).
>>
>> Yep, sounds good.
>
> When I get a sec I'll look at what's required and file a RH bug for
> evince to see if we can't get the package split up.

BTW where does the current sugar-evince srpm live?

Peter