Fedora Desktop on XO
dsd at laptop.org
Fri Jan 9 08:50:08 EST 2009
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:08 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > For the evince vs sugar-evince I suspect we need to try and get the
>>> > mainline evince split out into evince and evince-libs so that we
>>> > can build sugar-evince against it similar to what we do with
>>> > abiword and write (I think that's its name).
>>> Yep, sounds good.
>> When I get a sec I'll look at what's required and file a RH bug for
>> evince to see if we can't get the package split up.
> BTW where does the current sugar-evince srpm live?
Here is the diff against the corresponding evince version:
There are some changes to the core evince source which means that it
will be more than just splitting up the F10 evince package. But that
will certainly be a step in the right direction.
More information about the Devel