Fedora Desktop on XO
pbrobinson at gmail.com
Tue Jan 6 20:35:55 EST 2009
> > For the evince vs sugar-evince I suspect we need to try and get the
> > mainline evince split out into evince and evince-libs so that we
> > can build sugar-evince against it similar to what we do with
> > abiword and write (I think that's its name).
> Yep, sounds good.
When I get a sec I'll look at what's required and file a RH bug for
evince to see if we can't get the package split up.
> > As for the gconf2-dbus...... I know that's used over the usual dbus
> > to drop out the bonobo dependencies but whether that is still a
> > factor at the moment with the other things that pull bonobo in I'm
> > not sure so it might be worthwhile working out whether we stick
> > with it or move back to the mainline version. Not sure who knows
> > the answer to that one, I know DSD got it compiled up but other
> > than that I don't know the best person to ask.
> I think the reason we're using GConf2-dbus is actually that plain GConf2
> didn't work with Rainbow's preforking code after the move to F10, but
> we've reverted that preforking code for the moment, so perhaps we could
> just use plain GConf2..
If we can get a definite confirmation of that I'll untag the
GConf2-dbus build so that the original GConf gets pulled into joyride
and see where we end up from there.
More information about the Devel