Please unlock Activities/G1G1/8.2

[C. Scott Ananian]

On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>
> Am 28.09.2008 um 07:59 schrieb C. Scott Ananian:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The lock-down of this page (which causes lock-down of all included pages
>>> transitively) was fine until Scott replaced the references to the 8.2
>>> versions of activities with the old G1G1 page. E.g., when the page was
>>> locked, it included
>>>
>>>      http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/Etoys_(8.2)
>>>
>>> which is okay to be pegged at v. 94.
>>>
>>> But now it includes and locks down
>>>
>>>      http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/Etoys_(latest)
>>>
>>> which makes it impossible for me to update that page to v. 95 to match
>>> the
>>> latest joyride.
>>>
>>> Please unlock as long as the page references the original G1G1 page. See
>>> edit history at
>>>
>>>      http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/G1G1/8.2
>>
>> I expect to refork the Activities/G1G1 page soon (probably as soon as
>> we declare an 8.2 final).  In the interim, it makes my life easier to
>> both (a) have 8.2 point to G1G1, so I don't have to edit things in two
>> places, and (b) have the 8.2 (and G1G1) page locked, so that I am
>> certain I know what activity version changes are being
>> proposed/tested.  I don't expect this to last for long.
>>
>> For now, can you either ask me via email or file a trac request
>> assigned to me for the etoys update you'd like to make?  You can also
>> copy/paste the template into Activities/Joyride for now to get
>> testing; that shouldn't be locked.  Should the etoys update be
>> considered if we made another release candidate?  (I've noticed
>> there's a new etoys RPM in joyride).
>>
>> I know this is inconvenient, but if you can bear with me, it will make
>> my life in the next week easier.  You can transfer the inconvenience
>> to me by making me update your activity info for you, and if that gets
>> to be too much work it will motivate me to reconsider unprotecting the
>> page to let you do it yourself. =)
>
> Hehe. So please s/94/95/g in [Activities/Etoys (latest)].
>
> And yes, if #8608 gets approved and etoys-3.0.2159 gets in then please use
> Etoys-95, too (this is just if you are doing a new build anyway, do not hold
> the release for it).

Out of an abundance of caution: is there any problem with using
Etoys-95 if the etoys rpm is *not* updated?  I've upgraded Etoys on
the [[Activities/G1G1]] page, so our testers are probably testing
Etoys-95 + 765, which has etoys-2153-1.  Is that okay?
 --scott

-- 
                         ( http://cscott.net/ )