Please unlock Activities/G1G1/8.2

[Bert Freudenberg]

Am 28.09.2008 um 07:59 schrieb C. Scott Ananian:

> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de 
> > wrote:
>> The lock-down of this page (which causes lock-down of all included  
>> pages
>> transitively) was fine until Scott replaced the references to the 8.2
>> versions of activities with the old G1G1 page. E.g., when the page  
>> was
>> locked, it included
>>
>>       http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/Etoys_(8.2)
>>
>> which is okay to be pegged at v. 94.
>>
>> But now it includes and locks down
>>
>>       http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/Etoys_(latest)
>>
>> which makes it impossible for me to update that page to v. 95 to  
>> match the
>> latest joyride.
>>
>> Please unlock as long as the page references the original G1G1  
>> page. See
>> edit history at
>>
>>       http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/G1G1/8.2
>
> I expect to refork the Activities/G1G1 page soon (probably as soon as
> we declare an 8.2 final).  In the interim, it makes my life easier to
> both (a) have 8.2 point to G1G1, so I don't have to edit things in two
> places, and (b) have the 8.2 (and G1G1) page locked, so that I am
> certain I know what activity version changes are being
> proposed/tested.  I don't expect this to last for long.
>
> For now, can you either ask me via email or file a trac request
> assigned to me for the etoys update you'd like to make?  You can also
> copy/paste the template into Activities/Joyride for now to get
> testing; that shouldn't be locked.  Should the etoys update be
> considered if we made another release candidate?  (I've noticed
> there's a new etoys RPM in joyride).
>
> I know this is inconvenient, but if you can bear with me, it will make
> my life in the next week easier.  You can transfer the inconvenience
> to me by making me update your activity info for you, and if that gets
> to be too much work it will motivate me to reconsider unprotecting the
> page to let you do it yourself. =)

Hehe. So please s/94/95/g in [Activities/Etoys (latest)].

And yes, if #8608 gets approved and etoys-3.0.2159 gets in then please  
use Etoys-95, too (this is just if you are doing a new build anyway,  
do not hold the release for it).

- Bert -