Please unlock Activities/G1G1/8.2

[Bert Freudenberg]

Am 28.09.2008 um 11:30 schrieb C. Scott Ananian:

> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de 
> > wrote:
>>
>> Am 28.09.2008 um 07:59 schrieb C. Scott Ananian:
>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de 
>>> >
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The lock-down of this page (which causes lock-down of all  
>>>> included pages
>>>> transitively) was fine until Scott replaced the references to the  
>>>> 8.2
>>>> versions of activities with the old G1G1 page. E.g., when the  
>>>> page was
>>>> locked, it included
>>>>
>>>>     http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/Etoys_(8.2)
>>>>
>>>> which is okay to be pegged at v. 94.
>>>>
>>>> But now it includes and locks down
>>>>
>>>>     http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/Etoys_(latest)
>>>>
>>>> which makes it impossible for me to update that page to v. 95 to  
>>>> match
>>>> the
>>>> latest joyride.
>>>>
>>>> Please unlock as long as the page references the original G1G1  
>>>> page. See
>>>> edit history at
>>>>
>>>>     http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/G1G1/8.2
>>>
>>> I expect to refork the Activities/G1G1 page soon (probably as soon  
>>> as
>>> we declare an 8.2 final).  In the interim, it makes my life easier  
>>> to
>>> both (a) have 8.2 point to G1G1, so I don't have to edit things in  
>>> two
>>> places, and (b) have the 8.2 (and G1G1) page locked, so that I am
>>> certain I know what activity version changes are being
>>> proposed/tested.  I don't expect this to last for long.
>>>
>>> For now, can you either ask me via email or file a trac request
>>> assigned to me for the etoys update you'd like to make?  You can  
>>> also
>>> copy/paste the template into Activities/Joyride for now to get
>>> testing; that shouldn't be locked.  Should the etoys update be
>>> considered if we made another release candidate?  (I've noticed
>>> there's a new etoys RPM in joyride).
>>>
>>> I know this is inconvenient, but if you can bear with me, it will  
>>> make
>>> my life in the next week easier.  You can transfer the inconvenience
>>> to me by making me update your activity info for you, and if that  
>>> gets
>>> to be too much work it will motivate me to reconsider unprotecting  
>>> the
>>> page to let you do it yourself. =)
>>
>> Hehe. So please s/94/95/g in [Activities/Etoys (latest)].
>>
>> And yes, if #8608 gets approved and etoys-3.0.2159 gets in then  
>> please use
>> Etoys-95, too (this is just if you are doing a new build anyway, do  
>> not hold
>> the release for it).
>
> Out of an abundance of caution: is there any problem with using
> Etoys-95 if the etoys rpm is *not* updated?  I've upgraded Etoys on
> the [[Activities/G1G1]] page, so our testers are probably testing
> Etoys-95 + 765, which has etoys-2153-1.  Is that okay?

Yes, no problem. The only relevant change there is use of bundle_id  
instead of service_name.

- Bert -