semantic black ops for Activities? (Re: Greg Smith's Weekly Report)

[Seth Woodworth]

So far the semantic form for activities is very rough in actual data-points
and very rough in layout.

On the actual form, I think that there needs to be some small changes; a
drop down for languages, ability to add wiki-pages in certain fields instead
of urls, etc.

On the form's display, it would be possible to wrap the current data into a
box on the right hand side of the page, much like the current Activities
box.  I will try to describe what I would like to see more clearly on the
wiki-gang list and try to implement it (if I can).

On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:58 PM, Gary C Martin <gary at garycmartin.com>wrote:

> On 15 Sep 2008, at 23:58, Seth Woodworth wrote:
>
>  Gary, the wiki is generally discussed on the library list, and on the new
>> wiki-gang(@lists.l.o) list.  That may be why you missed information about
>> the implementation of SMW.
>>
>
> Thanks Seth, I'm still contemplating the changes (+ links as per your
> previous email). Just to be clear, I do like the move direction, I'm just
> trying to work out if it's now 'done' and if I (and other activity)
> developers should now go back and spend time revisiting and revising their
> activity wiki pages to comply.
>
> I think the main weird oddity I see now is that every activity page now
> using the new for has two blocks of apparently duplicate data showing, very
> confusing. There's a nicely formatted table at the very bottom (Facts about
> Moon), but before it is a great long ~page screed of the same data in a
> wasteful junky layout (Activity Summary). I initially thought my browser was
> showing some hidden or accidental field of junk data, but Firefox shows it
> too.
>
> --Gary
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20080916/32315cf0/attachment.html>