sugar 0.83 in joyride

[Tomeu Vizoso]

On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Ed McNierney <ed at laptop.org> wrote:
> This certainly seems like a reasonable solution.

Awesome, how much time would it take to get implemented?

Thanks,

Tomeu

> On Nov 6, 2008, at 10:16 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Hi again, I'm thinking that perhaps best would be to create a
>>> joyride branch similar to faster that sugar developers could
>>> administer by ourselves.
>>
>>> In that way we wouldn't be blocking on each other so often and
>>> Sugar developers could more easily adapt Sugar to the OLPC
>>> hardware.
>>
>> I'm fine with giving commit access to pilgrim/joyride to any Sugar
>> developers who want it.  Shall we just do that instead?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> - Chris.
>> --
>> Chris Ball   <cjb at laptop.org>
>
>