sugar 0.83 in joyride
tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net
Thu Nov 6 10:39:12 EST 2008
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Ed McNierney <ed at laptop.org> wrote:
> This certainly seems like a reasonable solution.
Awesome, how much time would it take to get implemented?
> On Nov 6, 2008, at 10:16 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
>>> Hi again, I'm thinking that perhaps best would be to create a
>>> joyride branch similar to faster that sugar developers could
>>> administer by ourselves.
>>> In that way we wouldn't be blocking on each other so often and
>>> Sugar developers could more easily adapt Sugar to the OLPC
>> I'm fine with giving commit access to pilgrim/joyride to any Sugar
>> developers who want it. Shall we just do that instead?
>> - Chris.
>> Chris Ball <cjb at laptop.org>
More information about the Devel