sugar 0.83 in joyride
ed at laptop.org
Thu Nov 6 10:34:31 EST 2008
This certainly seems like a reasonable solution.
On Nov 6, 2008, at 10:16 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
>> Hi again, I'm thinking that perhaps best would be to create a
>> joyride branch similar to faster that sugar developers could
>> administer by ourselves.
>> In that way we wouldn't be blocking on each other so often and
>> Sugar developers could more easily adapt Sugar to the OLPC
> I'm fine with giving commit access to pilgrim/joyride to any Sugar
> developers who want it. Shall we just do that instead?
> - Chris.
> Chris Ball <cjb at laptop.org>
More information about the Devel