sugar 0.83 in joyride

Chris Ball cjb at
Thu Nov 6 10:16:32 EST 2008


   > Hi again, I'm thinking that perhaps best would be to create a
   > joyride branch similar to faster that sugar developers could
   > administer by ourselves.

   > In that way we wouldn't be blocking on each other so often and
   > Sugar developers could more easily adapt Sugar to the OLPC
   > hardware.

I'm fine with giving commit access to pilgrim/joyride to any Sugar
developers who want it.  Shall we just do that instead?


- Chris.
Chris Ball   <cjb at>

More information about the Devel mailing list