sugar 0.83 in joyride
cjb at laptop.org
Thu Nov 6 10:16:32 EST 2008
> Hi again, I'm thinking that perhaps best would be to create a
> joyride branch similar to faster that sugar developers could
> administer by ourselves.
> In that way we wouldn't be blocking on each other so often and
> Sugar developers could more easily adapt Sugar to the OLPC
I'm fine with giving commit access to pilgrim/joyride to any Sugar
developers who want it. Shall we just do that instead?
Chris Ball <cjb at laptop.org>
More information about the Devel