wiki.laptop.org upgrade

[Ed McNierney]

Michael -

Thanks; welcome back!  I have been working on the request you made last
week, and on trying to have something out this week as I said I would.  It's
been important to me to ensure I'm reflecting OLPC's position as much as
possible rather than simply my own personal opinion, and I've been having
conversations to that effect.  Given the rather high priority on G1G1
activities that's been difficult but certainly not impossible.  I will
follow up on the details and work with you to complete this important task.
Thanks again for the help.

    - Ed


On 12/5/08 12:55 AM, "Michael Stone" <michael at laptop.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 01:47:02PM +1800, David Farning wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Ed McNierney <ed at laptop.org> wrote:
>>> David -
>>> 
>>> I don't understand that comment.  What "several efforts" are you talking
>>> about?  I don't think there were several efforts to publicize this outage -
>>> if so, the scope of those efforts wasn't sufficient IMHO.
>> 
>> I was speaking of larger communication issues.
>> 
>> Two week ago you said that a statement would be forthcoming about the
>> relationship between Sugar Labs and OLPC.  If you had _only_ failed to
>> follow though, that would have been one thing.
> 
>> Instead, you asked one of your employees to to say that a statement
>> would be coming.  Thereby putting his reputation, not yours, on the
>> line.
> 
> For the record, I was the one who asked Ed and Kim to assent to
> participating in a joint statement; not the other way around.
> 
> I requested this boon because I think that it's really quite important
> for the representatives of OLPC and SugarLabs who need to work together
> on a daily basis to be able to do so under mutually agreeable and
> agreed-upon terms.
> 
> Now that I'm back from my visits with friends and family, I'll naturally
> do what I can to see that this is put to rest as I hoped was going to
> take place in my absence.
> 
> Michael
> 
> P.S. - Ed -- do you have any suggestions or edits that you'd like to
> make before I start more broadly circulating, in draft form, the points
> that I suggested to you last week?