Build Debate: Followup on Build Naming

[Gary C Martin]

On 8 Apr 2008, at 04:53, Dennis Gilmore wrote:

> I honestly think we should call it OLPC 2  which matches the cvs/ 
> build tag and
> signifies release number 2
>
> OLPC 1 being ship.2
>
> then we just increment the number for each stable release.  we have a
> development codename of joyride.  we can create a name for each  
> release.

Wouldn't OLPC 2 be new XO hardware? Just a gut feeling I get – but at  
least there's no damn date in there ;-)

Gary