Reporting bugs

[Bert Freudenberg]

I've had comments like this on some of my own reports. These are  
usually not reproducable, strange things. Having to follow through  
when this is far from my own area of expertise simply takes time I  
can't effort. There indeed is "lack of interest on the part of the  
reporter", no denial here. I'm just saying that because of that, I  
stopped reporting those one-off bugs. Seeing comments like yours  
reinforces that decision.

- Bert -

On Oct 28, 2007, at 23:30 , Jim Gettys wrote:

> Look at the history; I asked for more information several days ago,  
> and
> no response to the request.  To make sure he got a copy, I added the
> reporter to the CC list, to generate another piece of mail in his  
> inbox.
>
> I certainly hope SJ adds the requested information and reopens it.
>                               Best Regards,
>                                        - Jim
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 17:49 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>> On Oct 28, 2007, at 17:37 , Zarro Boogs per Child wrote:
>>> Changes (by jg):
>>>
>>>  * cc: sj (added)
>>>   * status:  new => closed
>>>   * resolution:  => invalid
>>>
>>>
>>> Comment:
>>>
>>>  Closing due to lack of interest on the part of the reporter...
>>
>> Comments like this discourage reporting bugs.
>>
>> - Bert -
>>