Telling time (was: StopWatch activity)
Yoshiki Ohshima
yoshiki at vpri.org
Fri Nov 16 13:57:38 EST 2007
Nick,
At Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:13:34 -0500,
nick knouf wrote:
>
> > Bert Freudenberg writes:
> >
> > > I question the very assumption that continuously telling
> > > the time is even remotely important on a learning machine
> > > for kids in elementary school age.
> >
> > Dealing with time is a critical life skill that must be learned.
> > Having a clock is thus very important.
>
> Whose time? Hours minutes seconds? Days since a recent feast? When
> the sun is at a certain position in the sky? Since I last saw you on
> the road? How much do I quantize? Is quantization of time even a
> concept I am familiar with?
Well, it seems that you are responding to a wrong message.
> The notion of time is _highly_ contingent on situated cultural
> factors. Just because in the West we measure things using hours,
> minutes, and seconds, does not mean that the entire world does so.
> In fact, our conception of time is directly related to churches and
> clock towers in the middle ages (see Lewis Mumford on this idea)
> first, and then assembly lines and educational/disciplinary
> institutions (see Foucault) . The rest of the world has not
> necessarily adopted our way of dividing days into ever smaller
> chunks---perhaps there is no quantization at all!
>
> A clock application, especially given the areas of deployment, is
> _not_ something you rush into with the assumption that you can merely
> write a graphic display of 00:00:00. One must understand the local
> conditions to know how time is told _on the ground_ and be careful to
> not impose a Western notion of quantization and temporal division
> that might be entirely foreign.
So, what do you think about the idea of letting kids make their own
clocks?
-- Yoshiki
More information about the Devel
mailing list