[Testing] Journal and Tubes Minutes from 9/4/07

[Kim Quirk]

I agree Dan. You have the right picture.

We will document that XO3 could only talk to other XOs on the same mesh that
are NOT an MPP.

Kim


On 9/5/07, Dan Williams <dcbw at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 13:55 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > >    - Multicast is not forwarded across interfaces; so if one XO is a
> MPP
> > >    it can't collaborate with another XO connected to the mesh side.
> Dan will
> > >    write up a trac item to capture this problem -- perhaps we need a
> 'Multicast
> > >    join'.
> >
> > Server-based collaboration should still work, link-local collaboration
> > probably won't. We can't tell which mode was failing in #3134 and #3136
> -
> > without logs in the bug reports, we can only guess at what the
> > problem could be.
>
> We've decided we don't care about this issue too much.  If there is
> something like:
>
> XO1 <-----------> AP <------------> XO2 (portal) <----- mesh ----> XO3
>
> We care about XO1 and XO2 talking to each other, but we don't want XO3
> to be able to talk to or see either XO1 or XO2.  Until we get multicast
> bridging across our interfaces, we don't care about XO3 having anything
> other than plain internet access.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.laptop.org/private/testing/attachments/20070905/492a1a59/attachment.htm