[Testing] Activity Testing Matrix
Samuel Klein
sj at laptop.org
Mon Nov 12 20:36:23 EST 2007
I like it. Also, during phase one, we need to tell activity developers
the other things they should be doing : versioning their activity, putting
both source links and links to an .xo file online, adding metadata and
test plans. Ditto for library bundle creators; bundles are bundles.
SJ
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
>
> So looks like folks are starting to try it out.
>
> Here's what I'd like to do next.
>
> Phase One, PUBLICIZE TO DEVELOPERS. I want every activity developer to know
> that *this is the place* to link their activities and plans for testing. So
> I would like to send an email where activity developers will read it. Should
> this note go to devel at laptop.org? sugar at laptop.org? Other places?
>
> After developers have had a few days to (a) put their activity info up on the
> matrix, (b) try to puzzle out test cases, (c) point out the places where the
> process is probably busted, and (d) complain about how terribly inefficient a
> wiki-based system is for QA (heh), I'd like to move on to...
>
> Phase Two, PUBLICIZE TO EVERYONE ELSE. And I mean *everyone* else. Fedora
> folks, Ubuntu folks, Debian folks, SuSE folks. LUG mailing lists. Slashdot.
> Digg. The message should look like this: "OLPC needs your help, RIGHT NOW.
> All you need is a modern Linux distro (or even a Windows machine) and a
> couple of hours a day for the next several weeks, and you can be intimately
> involved in the most important software project in the history of mankind."
>
> Any objection to this plan? Pointers? Comments?
>
> --g
>
> --
> Greg DeKoenigsberg
> Community Development Manager
> Red Hat, Inc. :: 1-919-754-4255
> "To whomsoever much hath been given...
> ...from him much shall be asked"
>
More information about the Testing
mailing list