[Testing] test pages in the wiki

Christopher Blizzard blizzard at redhat.com
Tue May 29 20:58:01 EDT 2007


On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 18:06 -0400, Tim Reilly wrote:
> 
> 
> The difficulty of reporting 406 bugs is that some of them may already
> be
> fixed in 432 or some other new build. The new builds are SO much
> different that not testing the new build is often sorta nuts.
> 
> More test planning and test structuring will be welcome and useful,
> however we can find lots of bugs as is even without large plans. You
> don't need to be following a test plan to find many, many bugs or
> things
> that aren't working as intended. This is the gray area which I feel we
> are having a bit of difficulty.  

Probably the best way for you to get a handle on this is to get involved
directly.  Like, sitting with the developers and the guys doing the work
and trying to get your head around where we are going.  I wanted to do a
demo last week (but failed) and that would have helped do this.  But
co-location is important.

We've talked about doing some short term co-location out in Westford for
some other projects related to OLPC.  That might be a good start to get
things kicked off if we come out there and hang out for a couple of days
so that we can get questions answered.

--Chris



More information about the Testing mailing list