[sugar] SugarCamp

[Simon Schampijer]

Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net> wrote:
>> So, talks that IMO are more appropriate for this week, along with
>> people I'm most interested in hearing, are:
>>
>> - How Sugar-on-a-stick can better work for deployments such as the
>> ones carried on by http://schoolkey.net (Caroline Meeks)
>>
>> - How Sugar can better work in a LTSP environment (Brendan Powers)
>>
>> - How SugarLabs can better work together with teachers (Yamandú Ploskonka)
>>
>> - How SugarLabs should communicate its message (Greg DeKoenigsberg)
>>
>> - How SugarLabs can make easier to contribute to it (Mel Chua)
>>
>> - How SugarLabs could partner with for-profits that work on related
>> projects (Collabora on GNOME's telepathy, Nokia on PyMaemo, etc)
>> (Robert McQueen)
>>
>> - How SugarLabs is going to maintain the infrastructure needed to
>> support its own operations (Bernie Innocenti)
>>
>> - How SugarLabs is going to fund its own operations (Walter Bender)
>>
>> - How SugarLabs is going to govern itself (Walter Bender, David Farning?)
>>
>> - How SugarLabs is partnering with other organizations (David Farning)
> 
> 
> +1, all of these sounds like excellent ideas! I would also like them
> to be structured more like discussion/brainstorming than talks. But we
> definitely need someone to lead them and the owners your proposed
> sounds very good. (Not sure if Robert McQueen will be there though).
> 
> I'd like to propose another one:
> 
> - How Sugar Labs could better work with OLPC in satisfying their
> customers. (Greg Smith)
> 
> Marco

Yes make sense to me as well. I like the nature of a workshop more than 
talks. And the Topics do clearly call for that.

Best,
    Simon