[sugar] jabber.laptop.org

Morgan Collett morgan.collett at gmail.com
Tue Aug 5 08:12:19 EDT 2008


On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 14:02, Guillaume Desmottes
<guillaume.desmottes at collabora.co.uk> wrote:
> Le mardi 05 août 2008 à 12:24 +0100, Gary C Martin a écrit :
>> On 5 Aug 2008, at 09:46, Morgan Collett wrote:
>>
>> >> The xochat.org jabber server is the one I seem to reliably attach to
>> >> for my XO testing, though I'd love to see an official developer
>> >> jabber
>> >> server, so as not to pester real G1G1 users with my tests, and so we
>> >> can 'eat our own dogfood' in a dev environment**. Connecting to a
>> >> remote jabber server is currently the way to see and share with other
>> >> remote users*** in the neighborhood.
>> >>
>> >> ** perhaps Sugar Labs could run such an environment?
>> >
>> > Collabora run a server which is the default setting for jhbuild:
>> > olpc.collabora.co.uk
>>
>> That's good to hear re-confirmed, but I've not seen any buddies/
>> activities shared on olpc.collabora.co.uk for weeks/months. I'd just
>> assumed your server was always borked by lots of connections, or in
>> some unstable dev status, so I had switched over to xochat.org which
>> always seems to respond and have buddies showing.
>>
>> Using your recent "nc olpc.collabora.co.uk 5222" trick I can now see
>> olpc.collabora.co.uk is responding with some xml just fine. So, is no
>> one else using it, or should I do some debugging? Are you running a
>> dev version of a jabber server that's doing something different?
>
> olpc.collabora.co.uk was recently reinstalled to a new ejabberd server
> in order to test Gadget. The shared roster hack was removed which
> improve stability but doesn't automatically display all the connected
> buddies anymore. Gadget should solve that, I plan to merge it at the
> beginning of the 9.1.0 cycle.

Anyone know the status of jabber.laptop.org? Can someone zap the db
and bring it back up as a developer testing server?

I see the jabber server on schoolserver.laptop.org is also up but not
responding. Perhaps that needs the same treatment.

Regards
Morgan


More information about the Sugar mailing list