[sugar] taskframe and activity resizing

[Dan Williams]

On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 20:26 -0400, Erik Blankinship wrote:
> On 9/7/06, Marco Pesenti Gritti <mpg at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Erik Blankinship wrote:
> > > Right now, when toggling the taskframe on/off (F5), activities' edges
> > > are covered up.
> > >
> > > Is this the default behavior, or should we write our apps to
> > > dynamically resize to the new available screen real estate?
> >
> > No, that is the intended behavior. Activities should just take the whole
> > screen.
> >
> > > Will the
> > > taskframe's dis/appearance be animated at some point?
> >
> > Yes, it will. I hope to have more informations about the visual design soon.
> >
> > > Regardless, what event do we listen for to know when the taskframe's
> > > appearance is toggled?
> >
> > What is the use case for this?
> 
> I  would like to know which activity pixels are displayed and which are not.

Because...?

> Appearance of the taskframe might also impact intercepting
> mouse-events, or, dragging to/from the taskframe.

That's kind of the point...  the frame has to intercept mouse events to
be able to do what it does.

Dan

> _______________________________________________
> Sugar mailing list
> Sugar at laptop.org
> http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/sugar