[sugar] taskframe and activity resizing

[Erik Blankinship]

On 9/7/06, Marco Pesenti Gritti <mpg at redhat.com> wrote:
> Erik Blankinship wrote:
> > Right now, when toggling the taskframe on/off (F5), activities' edges
> > are covered up.
> >
> > Is this the default behavior, or should we write our apps to
> > dynamically resize to the new available screen real estate?
>
> No, that is the intended behavior. Activities should just take the whole
> screen.
>
> > Will the
> > taskframe's dis/appearance be animated at some point?
>
> Yes, it will. I hope to have more informations about the visual design soon.
>
> > Regardless, what event do we listen for to know when the taskframe's
> > appearance is toggled?
>
> What is the use case for this?

I  would like to know which activity pixels are displayed and which are not.

Appearance of the taskframe might also impact intercepting
mouse-events, or, dragging to/from the taskframe.