[Server-devel] Fixing bash script bogosity - help?
pgf at laptop.org
pgf at laptop.org
Tue Apr 28 10:33:42 EDT 2009
bert wrote:
>
> On 28.04.2009, at 15:09, pgf at laptop.org wrote:
>
> > bert wrote:
> >>
> >> On 28.04.2009, at 14:27, pgf at laptop.org wrote:
> >>
> >>> bert wrote:
> >>>>
....
> >>>>
> >>>> Maybe you should use su directly instead of runuser?
> >>>
> >>> won't that have the same problem? it still wants a command
> >>> passed via a -c STRING convention.
> >>>
> >>> i think this is somewhat intractable, and any time spent on it
> >>> would be better spent creating a patch to runuser that lets it
> >>> take its command as strace does, or as xterm does with -e, which
> >>> avoids the vector->string->vector translations which are the real
> >>> issue.
> >>
> >>
> >> No, su passes all arguments after -c to the program you specify.
> >
> > can you give an example?
> >
> > $ su root -c /bin/echo one two three
> > Password:
> >
> > $ su root -c '/bin/echo one two three'
> > Password:
> > one two three
> > $
>
>
> It's not a problem in su but in bash. See "man bash":
>
> -c string If the -c option is present, then commands are read from
> string. If there are arguments after the string, they are
> assigned to the positional parameters, starting with $0.
>
> Note it starts with $0 not $1. So this works:
>
> $ su root -c '/bin/echo "$@"' /bin/echo one two three
thanks -- i'd never seen that done before. (and it certainly
wasn't possible with the original shells.) whenever someone
teaches me something like that, i always wonder how long ago i
missed the memo announcing the new feature. :-)
martin: switch from runuser to su, just like bert said. :-)
paul
=---------------------
paul fox, pgf at laptop.org
More information about the Server-devel
mailing list