[Server-devel] Offline moodle notes in moodle.org

[Ludo (Marc Alier)]

Gears sounded like a exciting way to go right when Martin L told me on Skype
two weeks ago. That's why I've committed a talented guy like Ruben to dig on
this task. We are starting to work on it, and it might even work [image:
guiño]

BUT, in I've been working on a WS architecture for Moodle that can allow
SOME features of Moodle to be taken out to offline clients (I'm thinking
about Java<http://moodle.org/mod/glossary/showentry.php?courseid=5&concept=Java>Phones,
iPhones and other no Gears powered machines.

As Martin L. says some things move so fast we will not keep up to, BUT maybe
we can choose a part of moodle that makes sense to have in a limited device
like a phone or an ipod or nintendo ds, and bring it there. This way will
never aspire to take out all the features (due to the development rithms
that wise ML tells me ) like the gears approach... but hey! is worth a try.
So I will put people on both bets. And we are working on WS for other
purposes as important as this one
http://tracker<http://moodle.org/mod/resource/view.php?id=125>
.moodle.org/browse/MDL-12886

Sleeping is optional, sure :p

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff at gmail.com
> wrote:

> Posted on moodle.org http://moodle.org/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=107920
>
> Hi all! I have been away for a while working on other olpc stuff, but
> now my attention is returning to Moodle, and offline moodle is
> definitely in my roadmap.
>
> In the AU and NZ moot I had good chances to talk with Dan and MartinD
> about a cunning plan to get a Gears-based offline moodle going.
>
> When we disscussed architecture for the current moodle-on-a-stick
> (MoaS) based we also talked quite a bit about a Gears-based approach.
> At the time, it looked huge and risky. Google had just released GG,
> and was talking about upgrading Reader to use it.
>
> So there many things stacked against it: Noone had seen Reader doing
> the offline thing yet, Gears had a somewhat restrictive license, and
> it seemed that we'd have to implement a significant chunk of Moodle as
> an AJAX application.
>
> Things have changed between then and now. Google has made things much
> simpler now with a BSD license and Reader shows it can make the
> offline thing work very well.
>
> Reimplementing Moodle as an AJAX app was still a big monster in my
> head until recently. But a volunteer approached me recently saying he
> could take a stab at it, and I thought "what would be the simplest
> thing that could possibly work?"
>
> The answer was suprisingly simple: store the damn HTML, CSS and JS in
> the sqlite DB that Gears provides.
>
> So from the course page, we can "go offline" by
>
> - Storing the html+css in sqlite -
> - Requesting a special 'manifest of resources that are ok to use
> offline' - published by the course-format page...
> - Retrieving those offline resources. Initially, just mod/resource
> contents. Later we can extend this support to work with other modules.
> - When we use the course homepage later while offline, we'll walk the
> DOM to show CSS blocks 'disabled' (by graying them out) and we will
> disable links to resources we cannot support offline.
> - As the user browses the content we do have offline, the JS code
> keeps track of resources visited. Upon reconnection to the moodle
> site, we push back the collected logs to mdl_log(*)
> - Other modules (mod/forum for example) can be supported with ob magic
> and/or more explicit/AJAXy use of JS.
>
> * - we'll need to review the log handling code. So far we've never had
> "out-of-sequence" log entries, and this will introduce them for the
> first time. I'm sure there'll be a few gotchas there.
>
> Hearing this, MartinD suggested that - as long as we go the "store
> html" way (supported with output buffering tricks if needed) then we
> can add the ability to produce a plain old zipfile with a course
> homepage + static resources. I think it's a good secondary goal to
> have -- though I'm not sure what limits we'll have with this.
>
> Tony Anderson - the volunteer who sparked this - has been working on a
> proof-of-concept implementation. It currently uses Gears and
> GreaseMonkey, and requires a few manual tweaks. Unfortunately, I don't
> think that code can be merged directly - we will want to refine the
> approach to avoid GreaseMonkey and other inconveniences. My take is
> that we can either adapt it, or use it as a reference for a more
> moodlish implentation -- Tony is not a moodle dev, so he's not
> necessarily familiar with our odd style smile ).
>
> Tony's code is here
> http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/server-devel/2008-September/002101.html
> together with some discussion around it.
>
> I also hear noises from Barcelona -- Ludo and Ruben may be able to get
> involved. This could start getting interesting.
>
> Getting this from a PoC to something shippable will take a bit of
> work. Right now I still have a ton of work to do on other aspects of
> Moodle that are more urgent for OLPC, but I will find the time to work
> on this working with Tony, Ludo and Ruben. Sleeping is optional,
> right? wink
>
> Once the urgent infrastructure stuff for olpc is sorted, I'll be keen
> on bringing this to completion -- at least of an initial stage.
>
> --
>  martin.langhoff at gmail.com
>  martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect
>  - ask interesting questions
>  - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
>  - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
>



-- 
---
Ludo ( Marc Alier)
UPC - granludo at gmail.com - Tel. +34-934137885
http://orangoodling.blogspot.com - http://www.dfwikilabs.org -
http://ososdeviaje.dfwikilabs.org - http://mossegalapoma.cat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/server-devel/attachments/20081010/10940f85/attachment-0001.htm