[Server-devel] Network Provisioning
Stefan Reitz
stefan_w_reitz at hotmail.com
Fri Apr 25 08:29:27 EDT 2008
Hi Y'all,
On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 14:57 +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 2:38 PM, John Watlington <wad at media.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> Proposed change to the hardware spec:
>
> From one to four access points may use an simpler switch,
> connected to the server over a 100 Mb/s link. From five to seven
> access points will need a better switch, which provides a 1 GB/s
> link to the server.
>
> This means that a 1 GB/s interface should be specified for the servers.
I feel teleported back to my 3-19-08 mail:
[...]
(I am thinking server clusters - red hat cluster suite is offering some nice tools which I never got a chance to use / try - thinking 3 servers with fail-over and increased performance for clients (like two servers actually doing something...) would be a starting point)
Birmingham is looking at 49 schools with a total 14,000+ students.
[...]
Theoretically, yes... but perhaps this is a bit over the top. For the
space we are aiming...
please define our aim
- the XS services will bottleneck well before saturating 1Gb/s traffic
- 'upstream' services that the XS is routing will bottleneck well before 1Gb/s
if we see a 7-AP setup, it will be there to support either a large
number of laptops or a location with obstacles that needs many
antennaes. In any case, it will support laptops mostly peering w
eachother.
how about those 14 - 28 AP setups?
If we are designing for a "client base" of laptops that we actually
expect to saturate 1Gb, then... we need to start recommending a
mid-range server cluster, perhaps a SAN, all costing a few megabucks
--> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weasel_words
;-)
You get pretty decent off-the-shelf hardware for $500 (asus m2n, athlon x2 xx , 2GB RAM) + cost of storage space) per server.
And considering not every deployment is a remote underelectrified mountain / desert / ... area, this should not be light heartedly dismissed.
cheers,
m
And I agree with Aaron Huslage that the nature of the AP is going to be another big hitter. But I really haven't seen the numbers on the budget yet. A decent (non-WRT54(...)) AP comes for $300 - 450 and is still worth considering.
So long
Stefan
�
_________________________________________________________________
Lustige Emoticons für Ihren Messenger! Hier kostenlos downloaden!
http://messenger.live.de/mein/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/server-devel/attachments/20080425/58fc112b/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the Server-devel
mailing list