[OLPC-Peru] [Server-devel] Collaboration between schools
Walter Bender
walter.bender en gmail.com
Vie Mayo 2 07:32:47 EDT 2008
I recently spent a week with the team that will be operating the OLPC
support out of the UGELs and I found them to be anything but
controlling. They were all extremely enthusiastic about collaboration
and communication. But there are currently infrastructure constraints
that will need to be overcome. Much of the conversation during the
week was in regard to how to do end runs around some of these
limitations in the short term. I think the vector is pointing in the
right direction.
-walter
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 4:56 PM, info en olpc-peru.info
<info en olpc-peru.info> wrote:
> I would love to hear what are those "economic reasons". I am sure that
> most of you know that if they are
> connecting to the Internet then the "big" cost is paid. The rest are
> peanuts. So... what are those "economic reasons" to
> don't allow collaboration between schools? Today "economic reasons"...
> don't get surprise when you hear new
> and different rationalizations.
>
> Collaboration between schools would mean total communication between them.
>
> You need to understand what is an UGEL (UGEL = administrative unit in
> charge of many schools in what you would call a "county")
> ... Every UGEL in Peru feels they are "owners" of this or that
> territory. If the schools (teachers and pupils)
> join then they are "going further" than the UGEL borders. This, in the
> eyes of UGEL authorities, is not seen as a good control policy
> (control in all aspects that you can imagine).
>
> Are the XOs property of the children? Yes? Then I shut my big mouth.
> Not? Then we (you, me, all) need to think that this "no communication"
> between schools is just the tip
> of the iceberg.
>
> We need to think in different ways to "force" (friendly) the
> collaboration and bring down the walls that
> every small (or big) educative authority "needs" to put over what they
> think they control (the XOs, the project, etc.)
>
> Best regards,
>
> Javier Rodriguez
> Lima, Peru
>
>
>
> C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 6:28 PM, John Watlington <wad en laptop.org> wrote:
> >
> >> I learned more about the network built by the MED in Peru for their
> >> schools. Each school is in its own VLAN, and cannot route to the
> >> other schools, only to the Internet and to MED servers.
> >>
> >> They have good economic reasons for encouraging this, but
> >> it means that inter-school collaboration will have to happen
> >> through data pushed to an MED server (and won't be real-time
> >> activity collaboration).
> >>
> >
> > This is exactly why I wrote the
> > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Network_principles document. We should tell
> > Peru that their network infrastructure does not allow collaboration
> > between schools, not feel compelled to solve their problems for them
> > by engineering some fancy multihop proxy system to live on MED
> > servers. In the future, they can create tunnels through the MED
> > servers if they wish to allow collaboration.
> > --scott
> >
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Server-devel mailing list
> Server-devel en lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
>
More information about the Peru
mailing list