[Sur] [Sugar-devel] RFH - Journal corruption reports fom 8.2.1 users in Uy

Tomeu Vizoso tomeu en sugarlabs.org
Vie Ago 21 04:41:46 EDT 2009


2009/8/21 Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff en gmail.com>:
> 2009/8/21 Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu en sugarlabs.org>:
>> 2009/8/21 Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff en gmail.com>:
>>> 2009/8/21 Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu en sugarlabs.org>:
>>>> Yes, though if we manage to get the logs dir of a machine just after
>>>> the DS was "lost", there's lots of chances we are going to be able to
>>>
>>> The ones on the ramdisk? :-(
>>
>> Is ~/.sugar/default/logs in the ramdisk? This would be the first time
>> I hear about it.
>
> OLPC's builds (at least the F7/F9 based series) I understood they were
> on a ramdisk. Looking at it now, however, it seems that they aren't --
> but a restart of X clears it out anyway.
>
> So by the time the problem is _seen_, *poof*, logs are gone.
>
> Maybe something in the sugar startup clears it out. Dunno. Doesn't
> seem to be olpc-configure.

Should be kept in a subdir in there, from:

http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar/repos/mainline/blobs/cbd0509f4bcfe1b3e52f8898b1cb83d522337ab8/src/logsmanager.py#line25

But anyway, the failure to read the DS would be in the first boot
where the journal appears empty, not in the boot where the DS index
got corrupted.

Regards,

Tomeu

>
>
> m
> --
>  martin.langhoff en gmail.com
>  martin en laptop.org -- School Server Architect
>  - ask interesting questions
>  - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
>  - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
>



-- 
«Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar.
What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David
Farning


More information about the olpc-Sur mailing list