[Sur] TurtleArt versus Scratch

[Walter Bender]

Brian Silverman wrote Turtle Art originally to explore ideas that were
eventually embodied into Scratch. But that doesn't mean that it
doesn't have value in its own right. I have found it more accessible
for young children--a nice place to start exploring some ideas, but
not every idea. It may make sense to make some extensions that expand
its reach, but I agree that we shouldn't rewrite Etoys or Scratch.
(Maybe it would make sense to rewrite Turtle Art inside of Etoys?) But
let's keep exploring ideas.

regards.

-walter

2008/10/15 Daniel Ajoy <da.ajoy at gmail.com>:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:00:40 -0500, Paola Bruccoleri <pbruccoleri at adinet.com.uy> wrote:
>
>> Tiene mucha razón Luis con respecto a esas sugerencias; llega un momento en que se sienten las limitaciones.. pero pregunto ¿en ese caso, no deberemos ya usar etoys, scratch, etc?
>
>
> Desde mi punto de vista sí. Es más, no es TurtleArt simplemente un pequeño subconjunto de Scratch?
>
> Qué tiene TurtleArt que no tenga Scratch?
>
> Se incluye TurtleArt por defecto, sólo porque es pequeñito y Scratch ocupa más recursos?
>
> Está TurtleArt mejor integrado a Sugar que Scratch? De qué manera?
>
> Pienso que muchos de las extensiones que Luis pide para TurtleArt, Scratch ya las tiene.
>
> Daniel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lista olpc-Sur
> olpc-Sur at lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/olpc-sur
>



-- 
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org