[OLPC library] Wiki site map

[Samuel Klein]

A flat layout is intentional, so that specific projects that could be 
related to many others aren't shoehorned into having a 'parent' and 
'siblings'.  It is possible to keep a flat layout for the leaf pages
while having more orderly trees of categories, infoboxes, and the like.

However, if you have a specific tree hierarchy in mind, feel free to 
develop the idea in some temporary space.

> I have noticed that the wiki layout is very flat. Is that intential? A 
> tree hierachy would make navigation easier.

Organizing pages into the last two categories would be particularly 
helpful for orphans and lonelypages and projects that haven't yet found
a niche.

SJ


On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, David Farning wrote:
> Catergory 5 is tracking in nature.  There are a number of pages of
> project grids and ideas.  This theme could be continued by using a series
> of grids tracking the progress of projects.  Each project would get its own
> page which was linked to via a grid.  I belive that this structure would
> reduce much of the redundency on information about project and potentail projects.
>
> Catergory 6 is about the content management system.  This part really intrests
> me. It seems that the project needs to work on generating content be starting
> to worry about how to move it around.  As my granddad used to say, "The best
> cart in the world is not worth much without a horse to pull it."
>
> I am interested in organizing the content portion of the wiki these lines.
> Currently, I seem to spend a lot of time searching the wiki rather navigating:(
>
> Does this layout sound reasonable?