[Http-crcsync] General comments on crcsync document

Rusty Russell rusty at rustcorp.com.au
Thu Aug 6 22:17:48 EDT 2009

On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 06:35:20 am Alex Wulms wrote:
> All,
> Cool. So let's settle for CRC-64-ISO then for the time being and still leave 
> the 'negotation' option in the protocol for future extensions, like discussed 
> before. I'll update the document with the various protocol refinements.
> Hi Rusty,
> Assuming you are still following this list: does your library currently use 
> the CRC-64-ISO polynomial when the client selects 64-bit CRC or does this 
> require some code change?

CRC-64-ISO is the current polynomial.  If they ask for fewer bits, we take the
upper bits.


More information about the Http-crcsync mailing list