[Http-crcsync] Packaging crcsync / ccan

Martin Langhoff martin.langhoff at gmail.com
Mon Apr 27 05:39:27 EDT 2009


On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> I'd bundle the source under a ccan/ dir; that's generally the best way to use
> ccan (one day we'll have automagic update scripts for such layouts).

Cool.

> Certainly a libccan is worse than useless in a distribution, since we don't
> have any API stability at all, let alone ABI.

Will it at some point offer stability? Will different libs hosted
under ccan mature at different paces?

If the answer is yes to the second question, it might make sense to
package libcrcsync separately. Are the rsync folks interested in it?

cheers,


m
-- 
 martin.langhoff at gmail.com
 martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff


More information about the Http-crcsync mailing list