[Http-crcsync] Packaging crcsync / ccan

[Rusty Russell]

On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 02:10:09 am Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Hi Rusty,
> 
> is the ccan / crcsync code something that is in shape to get packaged?
> I am thinking of talking to Fedora and Debian folks to get things in
> motion...
> 
> Should it be packaged as the "ccan libraries" or as a self-standing crcsync lib?

I'd bundle the source under a ccan/ dir; that's generally the best way to use
ccan (one day we'll have automagic update scripts for such layouts).

Certainly a libccan is worse than useless in a distribution, since we don't
have any API stability at all, let alone ABI.

Cheers,
Rusty.