[Etoys] TransformationMorph issue
karlramberg at gmail.com
Tue Dec 9 13:28:41 EST 2008
Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:
> At Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:01:47 +0100,
> Karl Ramberg wrote:
>> No, because a morph without owner can't be flexed.
>> Morph>>addFlexShell http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9084
>> For PaintBoxMorph one can check the preference for big paint palette,
> Hmm, but the PaintBoxMorph>>beSupersized is alwaysw called with
> non-nil owner, right? I don't know the original intent of:
> self position: self position / scaleFactor.
> line, but something like the following is ugly but seems to work.
> | scaleFactor w m |
> scaleFactor := 1.5.
> self isFlexed
> ifFalse: [self scaleFactor: scaleFactor.
> m := self isFlexed ifTrue: [owner] ifFalse: [self].
> w := m width.
> m position: Display width - w @ 0.
> self changed]
I have not tested yet but this a lot simpler than what I tried :-)
> I'm not sure if addFlexShell failing nil owner is a real bug in the
> current system... There are other stuff that requires the onwer.
So I'll suggest a method comment mentioning that as a
"fix"(clarification) to the bug report I made.
More information about the Etoys