[Etoys] TransformationMorph issue

[Karl Ramberg]

Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:
> At Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:01:47 +0100,
> Karl Ramberg wrote:
>   
>> No, because a morph without owner can't be flexed.
>> Morph>>addFlexShell  http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9084
>>
>> For PaintBoxMorph one can check the preference for big paint palette, 
>>     
>
>   Hmm, but the PaintBoxMorph>>beSupersized is alwaysw called with
> non-nil owner, right?  I don't know the original intent of:
>
> 	self position: self position / scaleFactor.
>
> line, but something like the following is ugly but seems to work.
>
> beSupersized
> 	| scaleFactor w m |
> 	scaleFactor := 1.5.
> 	self isFlexed
> 		ifFalse: [self scaleFactor: scaleFactor.
> 			m := self isFlexed ifTrue: [owner] ifFalse: [self].
> 			w := m width.
> 			m position: Display width - w @ 0.
> 			self changed]
>   
I have not tested yet but this a lot simpler than what I tried :-)

> I'm not sure if addFlexShell failing nil owner is a real bug in the
> current system...  There are other stuff that requires the onwer.
So I'll suggest a method comment mentioning that as a 
"fix"(clarification) to the bug report I made.

Karl