[Etoys] zip optimization results
yoshiki at vpri.org
Thu Apr 10 17:14:46 EDT 2008
> > Numbers are in seconds, horizontally we see the zipping methods and
> > vertically three different projects. On a clean 3.0 image, loaded with
> > our customizations and luke's speed patch.
> > pr pr.gz.zip0 pr.zip0 pr.zip pr.gz
> > tr 37 1:20 1:29 1:29 46
> > c10 30 1:15 1:23 1:23 40
> > shp 18 30 32 36 20
> > where tr, c10, shp are different projects
> > pr = non-gzipped stand-alone .pr file
> > pr.gz.zip0 = gzipped .pr file in uncompressed zip archive
> > pr.zip0 = non-gzipped .pr file in uncompressed zip archive
> > pr.zip = non-gzipped .pr file in compressed zip archive
> > pr.gz = gzipped stand-alone .pr file
> I just reformatted your table for my own understanding. So apparently
> avoiding the zip-archive part is paramount for performance. We should
> figure out what's actually taking so long there ...
Yes. a stand-alone .pr file would lose a few other files in the
archive, right? I would hope that we can find a way to make "pr.zip0"
or "pr.zip" perform almost as fast as "pr"...
More information about the Etoys