[Etoys] zip optimization results

[Yoshiki Ohshima]

> > Numbers are in seconds, horizontally we see the zipping methods and
> > vertically three different projects. On a clean 3.0 image, loaded with
> > our customizations and luke's speed patch.
> >
> >      pr     pr.gz.zip0   pr.zip0  pr.zip     pr.gz
> > tr   37       1:20       1:29      1:29       46
> > c10  30       1:15       1:23      1:23       40
> > shp  18         30         32        36       20
> >
> > where tr, c10, shp are different projects
> >
> > pr = non-gzipped stand-alone .pr file
> > pr.gz.zip0 = gzipped .pr file in uncompressed zip archive
> > pr.zip0 = non-gzipped .pr file in uncompressed zip archive
> > pr.zip = non-gzipped .pr file in compressed zip archive
> > pr.gz = gzipped stand-alone .pr file
> 
> 
> I just reformatted your table for my own understanding. So apparently  
> avoiding the zip-archive part is paramount for performance. We should  
> figure out what's actually taking so long there ...

  Yes.  a stand-alone .pr file would lose a few other files in the
archive, right?  I would hope that we can find a way to make "pr.zip0"
or "pr.zip" perform almost as fast as "pr"...

-- Yoshiki